Search Results for "fencing"

257 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 257 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claim for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Reference for Municipal Market and Housing. Claimant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation awarded by SLAO under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case is a Land Acquisition Reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by the claimant, Pundalik Raghunath Mahulkar, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Lease of Playground to Trust for School Construction. Lease of Public Land for Educational Purpose Held Valid as Playground Not Reserved as Recreational Ground in Development Plan.

The petitioners, residents of Oshiwara and Lokhandwala area of Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on 13/08/2012 challenging the lease of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Aircraft Crash Damage Due to Alternative Remedy of Suit. Petitioners' claim for Rs. 75 lakhs for destruction of bungalow by naval aircraft crash rejected as writ court not appropriate forum for disputed facts.

The petitioners, owners of plots in Dabolim village, Goa, constructed a bungalow on the land. On 1st October 2002, a naval aircraft belonging to the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition for Lack of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Creating Third-Party Rights and Obtaining Consent Decree Without Disclosing Pending Proceedings Do Not Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case involves a criminal contempt petition filed by Dr. Ramesh D. Pandit and another (original plaintiffs) against Smt. Janabai and others (origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...