Search Results for "excisable goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "excisable goods"

107 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Labelling Activity Does Not Amount to Manufacture Under Note 3 to Chapter 18 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Additional labelling on already marketable goods without enhancing marketability does not constitute manufacture, and extended period of limitation is applicable due to suppression of facts.

30 Apr 2024

The case involves a batch of civil appeals filed by the revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against an order of CESTAT which allowed the responde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Dispute Over Related Person Status. The court held that sales between subsidiaries of a common holding company do not constitute transactions with a 'related person' under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as there was no mutual interest in each other's business, applying the arm's length principle.

22 Mar 2023

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) concerning the valuation of excisable goods under th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Excise Duty Refund Case Under Central Excise Act, 1944. Refund Denied as Value of Returned Goods Determined as Scrap Was Less Than Duty Paid Under Section 173L(v), with No Error Found in Valuation or Procedural Fairness.

5 Sep 2022

The dispute arose from a claim for refund of excise duty by an assessee manufacturer of plastic moulded furniture, who had issued credit notes for rej...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

9 Dec 2019

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case — Process Not Amounting to Manufacture Under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Internal Order Deciding Jurisdiction Is Not Appealable Under Section 35 of the Act.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Haldia against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Revenue's Appeal in Modvat Credit Case — Capital Goods Used for Exempted Job Work Not Eligible for Credit Under Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944. The court held that the use of capital goods for processing exempted goods on job work basis disentitles the assessee from Modvat credit, reversing the CESTAT order.

18 Feb 2013

The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against the CESTAT order which had confirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) order setting aside the Deputy Com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. CESTAT's direction to deposit Rs. 1 crore set aside as assessee had strong prima facie case on valuation under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Jabil Circuit India Private Limited, is a manufacturer of set-top boxes. It sold these boxes to Thomson Holdings India Private Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Excise Duty Valuation Case Under Section 145A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Excise duty on unsold stock not includible in inventory valuation as liability is not 'incurred' until goods are sold.

22 Jun 2011

The case involved an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the valuation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)