Search Results for "drawee bank jurisdiction"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Complaint for Procedural Irregularities. Taking Cognizance After Recording Sworn Statement and Validity of Power of Attorney Holder's Complaint Examined Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The High Court of Karnataka heard writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Dishonour of Cheque Due to Insufficient Funds. Conviction Set Aside as Complainant Failed to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The revision petition was filed by Smt. Gouri, the accused, challenging her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Complainant Bank, Restores Criminal Proceedings Quashed by High Court. High Court Erred in Quashing Charge-Sheet Solely Because Other Alleged Co-Accused Were Not Arraigned; Section 319 CrPC Provides Remedy to Array Additional Accused During Trial.

The appellant, M/s Suvarna Cooperative Bank Ltd, filed a complaint under Section 200 CrPC before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Discrepancy in Date of Knowledge of Dishonour — Notice Held to be Within Time as Complainant Received Information on 23rd May, 1997.

The appellant, Tarachand Paliwal (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Rupesh Paliwal), filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Return of Complaints in NI Act Cases Where Stage Under Section 145(2) Not Reached. Filing of Affidavit of Evidence Does Not Conclude Examination-in-Chief Under Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Rajesh Ashok Ranpura, filed four criminal writ petitions challenging orders passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 23rd Court, Esplana...