Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "distinct commercial goods"

586 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 586 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Levy on TDR/FSI Transfers by Builders Association. Transferable Development Rights (TDR) and Floor Space Index (FSI) are 'goods' under Article 366(12) of the Constitution and subject to GST as a supply under Section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

10 Apr 2018

The petitioners, Builders Association of Navi Mumbai and Neelsidhi Realties, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

High Court

Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeal in Summary Suit Under Commercial Courts Act — Order on Summons for Judgment Challenged as 'Judgment' Under Section 13(1A). Transitional Provisions and Assignment Orders Examined for Pending Suits Transferred to Commercial Division.

24 Oct 2016

The Commercial Appeal arose from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in Summons for Judgment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Valuation of Physician's Free Samples Under Central Excise Act. Free samples of medicines are excisable goods and must be valued under Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 based on price of comparable goods sold in the market.

28 Sep 2006

The petitioners, Indian Drugs Manufacturer's Association and M/s. Emil Pharmaceuticals Industries Pvt. Ltd., challenged Circular No. 813 dated 25/4/20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Jan 2014

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark and Copyright Infringement Suit Over Soybean Oil Labels — Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Minor Variations. The court held that the defendant's label for soybean oil was deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered label mark and artistic work, and granted an interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.

9 Mar 2021

The plaintiff, Sanjay Soya Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark and copyright infringement against the defendant, Narayani Trading Company, all...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against RBI Guidelines Prohibiting Merchanting Trade in Banned Goods During Pandemic. Clause 2(iii) of the 2020 MTT Guidelines is a reasonable restriction under Article 19(6) as it serves the legitimate aim of preserving domestic PPE stocks and is not manifestly arbitrary.

6 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court upholding Clause 2(iii) of the Revised Guidelines on Merchanting Trade Transactions ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)