Search Results for "dishonor"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Section 138 NI Act Case Due to Non-Prosecution by Complainant's Partner. Complaint Filed by Partner Without Proper Authorization Not Maintainable Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment of acquittal passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai on 30/08/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend in Commercial Summary Suit for Recovery of Rs.1 Crore Based on Negotiable Instrument. Triable Issues Raised Regarding Consideration and Liability of Defendants Under Order XXXVII CPC.

The plaintiff, Parag Jyotindra Gandhi, filed a commercial summary suit against the defendants, Jayant Narendra Mehta and Others, to recover a sum of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment and Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order in Service Charges Dispute. Applicant Company Held to be Necessary Party as Successor-in-Interest of Defendant Firm Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioners, Tarun Keshrichand Shah and Priyalata Keshrichand Shah, filed a suit (Suit No. 6117 of 2007) against M/s. Kishore Engineering Co. (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes FIR for Forgery and Cheating, Restores NI Act Complaint — Civil Suit Pending on Same Receipts Makes Criminal Proceedings Abuse of Process

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had declined to quash an FIR for forgery and cheating but h...