Search Results for "cotton contracts"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "cotton contracts"

92 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Registration of Revocation of General Power of Attorney. Registration of a deed of revocation of GPA by the Sub-Registrar without notice to the original holder is illegal and arbitrary, and the court declared it null and void.

18 Nov 2025

The petitioner, North Roof Ventures Private Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the regist...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Preliminary Decree. Court holds that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation when the plaintiff is in joint possession and that a co-owner can alienate only his share, not the entire property.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of their share in the joint family p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

24 Aug 2023

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking partition and separate possession of joint family properties. The app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Part in Income Tax Dispute Involving Disallowances Under Section 14A, Section 37, and Section 10B. The court held that Section 14A disallowance requires satisfaction of AO, scientific research expenditure not allowable, demurrage is business expenditure, and Section 10B deduction remanded.

7 May 2021

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had partly allowed the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Removal of Assets in Commercial Suit Despite Arbitration Clause — Interim Relief Granted Under Order 39 CPC. Trial Court Directed to Decide Interim Application on Merits Without Considering Maintainability Based on Arbitration Clause.

7 Aug 2019

The petitioner, INOX Leisure Limited, filed a commercial suit against Indo Pacific Projects Limited seeking recovery of security deposit and permissio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Workers in BHEL Case — Contract Labour Arrangement Held Sham Due to Direct Control and Supervision by Principal Employer. The Court affirmed that workmen performing identical duties under BHEL's supervision were entitled to reinstatement without backwages under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves appeals by Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) against a judgment of the Uttarakhand High Court dismissing its writ petition challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CGIT Award Holding Canteen Contract as Sham and Bogus, Directs Absorption of Canteen Workers as Direct Employees of Principal Employer. Contract Labour Arrangement Found to Be a Mere Facade with Principal Employer Exercising Complete Control Over Workers, Making Them Direct Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

26 Jul 2016

The petitioner, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., a public company, challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 (CGIT...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrators' Findings on Contract Notes and Liability. Court holds that failure to object to contract notes within reasonable time amounts to acceptance under NSE Bye-Laws and that arbitral tribunal's findings on facts and law are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Harinarayan Bajaj, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Industrial Dispute for Adjudication — Reference Need Not Contain Detailed Facts, Only Dispute Must Be Identifiable. The Court held that an order of reference under Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is valid even if it does not contain the nature of dispute or facts and circumstances, as long as the dispute is identifiable from the reference.

21 Dec 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order dated 3/4/2006 passed by the Industrial Court/Tribunal, Nagpur in Reference No....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Reference in Employer-Workman Dispute Under U.P. Industrial Disputes Act — Individual Grievance Not Industrial Dispute. A Dispute Between an Employer and a Single Workman Does Not Fall Within the Definition of 'Industrial Dispute' Under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Unless Espoused by a Body or Considerable Section of Workmen.

20 Mar 1957

This case concerned a challenge to the validity of a reference made by the Government under the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, to the Industrial ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)