Search Results for "consumer protection"

658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Joint Consumer Complaint by Flat Buyers Under Section 12(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Common Grievance Sufficient Despite Different Dates, Costs, and Sizes. NCDRC's Dismissal Set Aside, Matter Remitted for Fresh Consideration.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 19 February 2016, which dismissed a consumer compl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows University's Petition to Quash Consumer Forum Proceedings. Educational Services Not Covered Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioner, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, a statutory university established under the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Defective Machinery. Claim Barred by Limitation as Arbitration Reference Made Beyond Three Years from Cause of Action Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Premlaxmi & Co., placed an order with respondent No.1, Ingersoll Rand (India) Limited, for purchase of portable compressors. Four ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...