Search Results for "consent settlement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "consent settlement"

1854 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1854 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Claimants' Signatures on Settlement Memo. Lok Adalat Award Set Aside as Settlement Memo Not Signed by Claimants, Violating Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and Appeal Restored for Merits Hearing.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a motor accident claim where the husband and father of the petitioners died in a road traffic accident. The Motor Accidents Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds It Has Power to Accept Consent Terms and Compound Offence Under Section 138 NI Act in Revision Proceedings. The Court clarifies that Section 397 CrPC read with Section 401 CrPC empowers the High Court to record compromise and acquit accused even in revision, subject to satisfaction of complainant.

20 Dec 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a group of criminal revision applications and connected matters, all arising from proceedings under Section 138 of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

8 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

1 Jan 2020

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

20 Aug 2019

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows TNEB Appeal in Dearness Allowance Dispute — Board Bound by Settlement to Follow State Government DA Rates. Employees Cannot Claim Higher DA Based on Central Government Rates When Settlement Links DA to State Government Rates.

13 Feb 2019

The appeals arise from a dispute between the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Board) and its employees' unions regarding the payment of Dearness Allowanc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Settlement Application in Customs Duty Case — Settlement Commission Cannot Reject Application on Grounds Not Specified in Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962. The court held that the conditions for rejection of a settlement application are only those enumerated in Section 127B(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Settlement Commission cannot impose additional conditions such as requiring the applicant to admit the entire duty liability before filing the application.

21 Nov 2016

The petitioner, M/s Auto Creaters, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the common order dated 14th March ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope of Incidental Issues in Computation of Benefits. The court held that the Labour Court can decide incidental issues such as interpretation of settlements when computing benefits under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the workman's right to continuity of service had been established.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Force Motors Ltd., challenged an order of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted ce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

11 Jul 2005

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)