Search Results for "commercial dispute"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Design Infringement Suit Transfer Case — Commercial Court at District Level Competent to Decide Cancellation of Design Under Section 22(4) of Designs Act, 2000. Transfer to High Court Not Mandatory Where High Court Lacks Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction.

The present appeal arose from a suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Mold Tek Packaging Ltd., against the appellant, S.D. Containers Indore, seeking a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Editor-in-Chief in Abetment to Suicide Case — High Court Erred in Declining Bail Without Prima Facie Evaluation of FIR. Non-Payment of Dues Alone Does Not Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC.

The appellant, Arnab Manoranjan Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, was arrested on 4 November 2020 in connection with FIR No. 59 of 2018 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Foreign Company in Arbitration Dispute — Holds That Foreign Award Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Challenge to Foreign Award Lies Only Under Sections 47-48 for Enforcement, Overruling Bombay High Court's Reliance on Bhatia International.

The appellant, Noy Vallesina Engineering SpA (now Noy Ambiente S.p.a), an Italian company, challenged a judgment of the Bombay High Court which held t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows NCDC's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Deduction of Grants as Revenue Expenditure. Grants disbursed by a statutory corporation as part of its business are deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, regardless of the capital nature of the source funds.

The National Co-operative Development Corporation (NCDC), established under the National Co-operative Development Corporation Act, 1962, is a statutor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal Against National Textile Corporation in Pre-Nationalisation Dues Dispute. Claims for pre-nationalisation period cannot be enforced against the successor entity under the Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995.

The dispute arose from credit facilities extended by UCO Bank (appellant) to Shree Sitaram Mills Ltd., which was taken over by the National Textile Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Repeated Delays in Filing Written Statement. Unamended Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is Directory but Gross Negligence Justifies Striking Off Defence.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Desh Raj against the order of the Delhi High Court which upheld the Civil Court's decision to close hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...