Search Results for "closure without costs"

514 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 514 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award in Closure Dispute — Burden of Proof Misplaced. Employer's Failure to Rebut Union's Claim Does Not Shift Burden of Proving Workman Status Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Siemens Ltd., challenged an award dated 2nd November 2018 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Aurangabad in Reference (IT) No. 08 of 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in E-Auction Dispute Due to Technical Glitch and Lack of Arbitrariness. Connectivity failure at service provider's end justified resumption of auction; High Court's interference in commercial decision set aside.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (BCCL) against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court, which had quashed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Retrenched Workers Seeking Reinstatement and Continuity of Service. Workers of a closed textile mill not entitled to reinstatement as closure was genuine and compensation under Section 25FFF of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was paid.

The petitioners, 42 workers of Kalmeshwar Textile Mills, challenged their retrenchment following the closure of the mill. The mill was closed due to f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved by Oral and Documentary Evidence. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Lack of Negligence Despite Clear Evidence of Rash Driving and Criminal Conviction.

The appellant, Santosh Chandrakant Potdar, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a...