Search Results for "caste insult"

264 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Public View and Intent to Humiliate. Alleged Caste-Based Insult in Private House Not Covered Under Section 3(1)(10) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The present application was filed by the applicants (original accused) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Public View and Counterblast Nature. Alleged Offence Under Section 3(1)(10) of SC/ST Act Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting and Was Motivated by Prior Litigation Under Section 138 NI Act.

The present application was filed by the applicants (original accused) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate Based on Caste. Alleged Abusive Words Not Uttered in Public View and Absence of Caste-Based Insults Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

The applicant, Avakash Ingole, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.109/2021 reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Intent. Land Dispute Not Sufficient to Attract Atrocities Act Without Specific Allegation of Intent to Humiliate on Caste Grounds.

The appellants, Keshav Reddy Yeltiwar and his two sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not in Public View. Court holds that Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 requires insult to be in public view, and private conversation does not attract the provision.

The present appeal was filed by three appellants, namely Gayatri Sanjay Jaitmal, Baburao Rahuba Sonawane, and Padmabai Baburao Sonawane, challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults and Outraging Modesty Found Vague and Contradictory, Not Attracting Bar Under Section 18 of SC/ST Act.

The present appeal was filed by Suryakant Vitthalrao Shelke and Pradip Ramrao Surwase against the order of the Sessions Court rejecting their applicat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred Inside Police Station, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Mohammed Nazim, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani in Special Case No.22/2004 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Keshao Pandurang Dange, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, in Special Case No.116 of 1994 for offences und...