Search Results for "bootleggers"

Trending :

Search Results for "bootleggers"

316 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail Not Considered. Failure to consider pending bail applications and absence of credible material linking detenu to public order disturbance renders detention order invalid under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Govindsing Papulsing Tak, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 February 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Failure to Consider Bail Orders and Unverified In-Camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug offenders, Dangerous persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

19 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Lakhan Rohidas Jagtap, challenged a preventive detention order dated 15 March 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Communication of Documents — Violation of Section 8 MPDA Act. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu Was Not Supplied Copies of In-Camera Statements and Bail Order, Depriving Him of Right to Make Effective Representation.

28 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Omkar Chandrashekhar Kapare, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Detenu Already in Jail — Subjective Satisfaction Vitiated. Detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority failed to consider necessity of preventive detention when detenu was already in custody.

7 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Pramod Ashok Pujari, was a detenu under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay — Failure to Explain Gap Between Prejudicial Activities and Detention Order Breaks Live Link and Vitiates Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Explain Delay of Over Three Months.

17 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Rajesh Vasant Jadhav, challenged an order of detention dated 30th June 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Greater Bombay, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Acquittal in Criminal Cases Renders Detention Invalid. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority did not consider material fact of acquittal in two criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Dadu Mangale, challenged a detention order dated 3/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai under Section 3(2)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind in Grounds of Detention. The court held that failure to specify the period of detention in the grounds and non-consideration of representation by the detaining authority vitiates the preventive detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

10 Jan 2006

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Rafiq Sarvar Shaikh @ Rafu, challenged the detention order dated 31/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Br...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The court held that a delay of about 82 days in deciding the detenu's representation without any explanation vitiates the detention order under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

24 Aug 2005

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Taki Ahmed Ali Chunara @ Mohammed Islam Mohammed Ali Shaikh, challenged the detention order passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Documents Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the petitioner's application dated 2.10.2004 seeking copies of documents vitiated the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders & Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Ramesh Ramnath Shetty, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 17th September 2004 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Lack of Proximity Between Grounds and Detention. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the conditions of bail and the staleness of the grounds vitiated the detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

9 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Shadab Siddiq Khan @ Shadab Chikna, was detained under an order dated 17th November 2004 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)