Search Results for "bomb blasts"

48 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SAFEMA Notice Against Family Members of Convicted NDPS Offender. Property Attachment Under SAFEMA Sections 68A-68I Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome.

The petitioners, Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan, Junaid Ebrahim Khan, Faizal Ebrahim Khan, Imran Ebrahim Khan, and Afzal Ebrahim Khan, are family members of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement. Trial Court's Discretion to Pass Judgment Without Trial Upheld Where Defendants Neglected to File Written Statement Despite Multiple Opportunities.

The appeal arises from a judgment dated 12.7.2006 passed by the trial court decreeing the plaintiff's suit for Rs.16,43,200/- with future interest at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Family Pension Claim Under CRPF Rules — Liberal Interpretation of 'Family' Includes Widow Despite Husband's Remarriage. The Court held that the definition of 'family' under Rule 5 of CRPF Rules, 1971 includes the first wife, and denial of pension would be unjust.

The petitioner, Smt. Ranjana w/o Bhaskar Anasane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking family pension as the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Senior Citizen Insolvents Under Section 38 of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act — Assets Fully Administered and No Objection from Creditor. Insolvents Granted Discharge After 9 Years of Undischarged Insolvency, Relieved of Stigma and Disabilities.

The judgment concerns a discharge application filed by two insolvents, Lav Chadha and Naresh Chadha, who are senior citizens aged 65 and 61 respective...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers PIL on Infrastructure of Judiciary; Examines Primacy of High Court's Recommendations for Additional Courts. Court Notes State Government's Delays and Insistence That Its Own Views Prevail, Highlighting Need for 867 Additional Courts and Special Courts for Vulnerable Groups.

This public interest litigation was instituted by a chartered accountant, Vihar Durve, raising concerns about the infrastructure of the judiciary in t...