Search Results for "attachment recall"

79 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 79 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court Order Impleading Purchasers in Second Appeal. High Court Allowed Condonation of Delay and Impleadment Under Order I Rule 10 and Order XXII Rule 10 CPC Despite Lis Pendens.

The litigation originates from a property dispute between the widows of Girdhari Lal. The original plaintiff Bhagwan Dai filed a suit claiming exclusi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in PMLA Default Bail Case — BNSS Proviso Not Retrospective. Complaint Filed Before BNSS Commencement Governed by Old Law; No Default Bail as Complaint Filed Within 60 Days of Arrest.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court's order rejecting default bail to the appellant, Parvinder Singh, in a money ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was found untrustworthy and the recovery of weapon was not sufficiently corroborated.

The appellant, Hira Lohar, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Bishnath Mehar. The prosecution case relied heavily on the sole testi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Execution Sale Dispute for Limitation Determination. High Court's Order Setting Aside Auction Sale Set Aside for Ignoring Supreme Court's Direction to Decide Limitation First.

The dispute arises from execution proceedings of a decree passed in favour of Shree Mahalaxmi Mercantile Coop Bank Ltd. (R2) against M/s. Abhilasha Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance with Exemplary Costs for Suppression of Facts and Forum Shopping. Plaintiffs failed to disclose prior pending suit and obtained ex parte orders by misrepresentation, leading to dismissal and costs of Rs. 5 lakhs.

The plaintiffs, Anand Agarwal and Pramila Anand Agarwal, filed a Commercial Suit No. 614 of 2017 before the Bombay High Court seeking specific perform...