Search Results for "apprentice workers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "apprentice workers"

53 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 53 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Claim of No Direct Employment. Commissioner's Award of Rs.5,65,065 with 12% Interest and 50% Penalty Upheld Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

6 Feb 2026

The present appeal was filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, by the appellant, who was the employer before the learned Workm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Finding That Employee is a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on the workman status under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 226/227.

4 Jan 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Taj SATS Air Catering, Goa Unit, challenged an order dated 25.10.2018 passed by the Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Goa, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Judgment Setting Aside Appellate Authority Order Under Madhya Pradesh Shops & Establishments Act, 1958. The Court affirmed that clubs not being residential clubs are exempt from the Act under Section 3(j), rendering the Appellate Authority's reinstatement order invalid.

26 Oct 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of services of the appellants, who were employees at a club run by the respondents. The appellants filed a comp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging ESI Coverage for Sweet Shop Based on Disputed Employee Count. Court holds that ESI Corporation must determine coverage under Section 2(12) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 after proper inquiry and opportunity of hearing.

6 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s Anil Chat Bhandar, a proprietary concern engaged in preparing and selling sweets and snacks in Nagpur, challenged orders passed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions by Educational Society Against Labour Court Orders Granting Compensation to Workman. Employer's failure to prove abandonment of service and non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 leads to reinstatement with back wages.

2 Jun 2017

The Karnataka Lingayat Education Society and its affiliated college, C.B. Kore Polytechnic, filed multiple writ petitions challenging orders of the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Cooperative Court Orders in Service Disputes — Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employees. Cooperative Court and Appellate Tribunal orders reinstating employees with continuity of service and back wages upheld as the bank failed to prove misconduct and violated principles of natural justice.

11 Mar 2016

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Cooperative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed four writ petitions challenging identical judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding That Petitioner Is Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Managerial Designation and Supervisory Duties Exclude Workman Status. The court held that the nature of duties, not designation, determines workman status under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Petitioner's role as Manager Field Services involved supervisory and managerial functions.

17 Dec 2015

The Petitioner, Arun Ramchandra Hublikar, was appointed as a Trainee Service Engineer on 2 May 1985 by Cummins Diesel Sales & Service (I) Ltd. (now Cu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

21 Feb 2011

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Petitioner failed to establish employer-employee relationship with respondent company as he was engaged through a contractor.

23 Mar 2005

The petitioner, M.G. Bhide, filed a complaint before the Industrial Court at Pune under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding that Senior Engineer and Engineering Assistant are Not Workmen under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioners' Complaints under MRTU & PULP Act Dismissed as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Workman Status.

11 Feb 2005

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the Labour Court's orders dated 23rd July 1999, which held that the Petitioners were no...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)