Search Results for "appeal scope"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "appeal scope"

8469 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8469 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Considers Maintainability of Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC and Examines Plaintiff’s Readiness and Willingness in Suit for Specific Performance of Agricultural Land Sale Agreement; Trial Court Had Dismissed Specific Performance but Directed Refund of Advance with Interest

3 Mar 2015

The appeal arose from the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2014 in O.S. No.1/2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tiptur, partly decreeing t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Summary Assessment Under Section 62 of MGST Act Due to Technical Glitches and Non-Service of Order. The court directed the appellate authority to entertain the appeal and decide it on merits, condoning the delay caused by technical issues and non-service of the assessment order.

3 Dec 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Meritas Hotels Pvt. Ltd., challenged the action of respondent no.5 (Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeals-IV)) in refusing to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Liberty to Withdraw Suit Under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC — Appeal Not Maintainable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The order granting leave to withdraw with liberty to file fresh suit is not a 'judgment' under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and hence no appeal lies.

11 Mar 2022

The Appellant, Resilient Innovations Private Limited, filed an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC — Condonation of Delay Granted. The court held that the victim's right to appeal is independent and delay can be condoned if sufficient cause is shown.

23 Jun 2016

The petitioner, Parbhani District Central Bank Ltd., through its Assistant Manager Digambar s/o Madanrao Parve, filed a criminal writ petition challen...

High Court

Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeal in Summary Suit Under Commercial Courts Act — Order on Summons for Judgment Challenged as 'Judgment' Under Section 13(1A). Transitional Provisions and Assignment Orders Examined for Pending Suits Transferred to Commercial Division.

24 Oct 2016

The Commercial Appeal arose from an order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High Court in Summons for Judgment...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Execution Petition — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Not Applicable to Orders Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. First Appellate Court Directed to Consider Condonation of Delay Application on Merits Before Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred.

17 Jul 2013

This second appeal was filed by the decree-holder in HRC 4/78 against the rejection of his execution petition in Exn.P.162/90 and the judgment of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Review Order Deleting Possession Finding in Property Dispute. The High Court exceeded its review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC by deleting a finding on possession based on non-framing of issue, which was not an error apparent on the face of the record.

3 Nov 2020

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the High Court's order in a review petition that deleted a paragraph from its earlier judgment in a proper...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decree. The court held that the appellant-defendant No.6 failed to raise any substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC, and the concurrent findings of fact by the lower appellate court did not warrant interference.

25 Jan 2024

The present Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed by the appellant, who was defendant No.6 in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

17 Oct 2018

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — High Court Erred in Reversing First Appellate Court's Refusal of Possession Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Cannot Be Entertained Without Formulating a Substantial Question of Law.

27 Aug 2020

The case involves a property dispute between Nazir Mohamed (appellant) and J. Kamala (respondent) over a building and premises in Aduthurai, Tamil Nad...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)