Search Results for "amending act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "amending act"

1959 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1959 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree Held Valid. The Explanation defining 'partition' as only by registered deed or court decree is not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14, 15, or 21 of the Constitution.

19 Feb 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased original petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets Prospective vs. Retrospective Operation of Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act in Second Appeals. Court Examines Coparcenary Rights of Daughters Born Before and After 2005 Amendment and Whether Division Bench Decision Is Per Incuriam.

14 Aug 2014

This matter came before a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court upon a reference by a learned Single Judge (R.G. Ketkar, J.) who doubted the correctness...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Explanation to Section 6(5) of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 — Partition by Execution of Registered Deed or Court Decree is Valid and Not Unconstitutional. The court held that the Explanation defining partition as only by registered deed or court decree is within legislative competence and does not violate fundamental rights.

19 Feb 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Puttalinganagouda @ Veeranagouda B Patil, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition Challenging Reservation in Government Tenders for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Petitioner Asserts that Amendment to Section 6 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Act, 1999 and Insertion of Rule 27(A) Providing 17.15% and 6.95% Reservation for SC/ST in Works up to ₹50 Lakhs Violates Constitutional Rights.

20 Dec 2019

The petitioner, a Class-I contractor enrolled with the Karnataka Public Works Department since 2008-09, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

23 Dec 2014

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Draft Development Plan and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. General Body Resolution Modifying Draft Plan Upheld as Legislative Function; Ex Post Facto Extension Held Permissible.

5 Aug 2016

This judgment arose from writ petitions filed before the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court challenging the notification dated 4 February 2016 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Extension of Government Management Under Industries Act, Upholding Interpretation of Section 18A Conditions. Extension of Industrial Undertaking Management Upheld as Statutory Conditions Relate to Owner's Management Period and Continue During Government Control.

1 May 1957

The Supreme Court decided a group of petitions challenging an order that extended the Central Government's management of certain sugar mills. The orig...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013

1 Oct 2014

The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)