Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

204 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business, which become irrecoverable and written off, are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) even if not claimed as bad debt under Section 36(1)(vii).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a project named...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Advances Written Off as Business Loss Under Section 37(1) Allowed Despite Bad Debt Claim Under Section 36(1)(vii) Being Time-Barred. Court holds that advances given in the course of construction business which become irrecoverable and written off in books of account are allowable as business loss under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, even if the claim under Section 36(1)(vii) fails due to non-compliance with Section 36(2).

22 Jan 2026

The appellant, M/s. Deccan Estates, a builder, entered into a joint venture agreement on 10.12.1995 with landowners for development of a property name...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Deduction of Broken Period Interest for Banks Treating Securities as Stock-in-TradeDeduction Allowed as Revenue Expenditure for Banks Holding Securities as Stock-in-Trade

16 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court addressed the treatment of broken period interest for tax purposes. The issue centered on whether broken period interest could be de...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Carbon Credit Deduction Case — Income from Sale of Carbon Credits Held Not Derived from Eligible Business Under Section 80IA of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision quashing the revision order under Section 263, finding no substantial question of law.

29 Mar 2016

The appellant, Commissioner of Income Tax-III, Bangalore, filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the In...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act Runs from Date of Service of Order. The court held that the word 'passed' in Section 55(1) must be read as 'served' to give effect to the right of revision, and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has power to condone delay under Section 32(5)(a) of the Act.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid. The court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves multiple civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal allowing appeal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case on Lease Rental Deduction for Idle Machinery. Business decision to keep dozers idle and pay lease rentals without use held not allowable as expenditure under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

29 Sep 2010

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of lease renta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bonus Calculation Dispute Involving Subsidiary Company. Service Fee Payment Under Technical Aid Agreement Held to Be Legitimate Expenditure, and Deduction of Bonus as Prior Charge Before Depreciation and Tax Ruled Improper Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

6 May 1959

The dispute arose out of a claim for bonus by the workmen of Crompton Parkinson (Works) Private Ltd., Bombay, which was initially a wholly-owned subsi...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)