Search Results for "Upfront Payment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Upfront Payment"

98 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 98 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Assessee's Refund Claim Under Finance Act, 2017, Rejecting Limitation Plea of Revenue. Refund Application for Service Tax on Long-Term Lease of Industrial Plots Held Timely as Limitation Commences from Date of SIPCOT Certificate, Not from Date of President's Assent Under Section 104 of Finance Act, 2017.

14 Jul 2026

The appeal arose from the rejection of a refund claim under the Finance Act, 2017, concerning service tax paid on the upfront amount (premium) for a l...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

26 Jul 2024

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compounding Application for TDS Default Despite Delay in Filing, Directs Reconsideration of Compounding Fees. Petitioners deposited TDS belatedly but before show cause notice; court held that compounding application cannot be rejected solely on ground of delay in filing where no prosecution was pending.

18 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Sofitel Realty LLP and its partners, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of their compounding application for offences un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Successful Resolution Applicant and Resolution Professional in IBC Case — Commercial Wisdom of CoC Upheld. NCLAT Order Set Aside as It Improperly Interfered with CoC's Decision to Accept H1 Bidder's Plan Despite Belated Revised Offer.

17 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Ngaitlang Dhar (successful resolution applicant) and Amit Pareek (Resolution Professional) against the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal of Claimants in Motor Accident Case — Enhances Compensation by Including Prepaid License Fee in Deceased's Income. Income Tax Return Held as Primary Evidence for Determining Annual Income; Depreciation Not Considered as Income.

9 Dec 2019

The appellants, heirs of Aranganathan who died in a motor accident on 25 May 2001, filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

8 Aug 2016

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

17 Apr 2012

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Trading Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be in Conflict with Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of the contract and byelaws was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not warrant interference.

11 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral award d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act to Appoint Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Payment of Stamp Duty on Agreement. Court holds that stamp duty is a fiscal matter and not a bar to appointment of arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Lloyds Realty Developers Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)