Search Results for "Trademark Dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Trademark Dispute"

103 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

19 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against MakeMyTrip Officials in Trademark Infringement Case — Domain Name Dispute Lacks Criminal Intent. Court holds that mere registration of similar domain names without evidence of dishonest intention does not constitute criminal offence under Sections 63, 103, 104 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

16 Aug 2019

The case involves three criminal applications filed by Rajesh Dalal (Vice President), Make My Trip India Pvt. Ltd., and Deep Kalra (CEO) seeking quash...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Ex-Parte Ad-Interim Order in Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction. Suit filed without cause of action within court's territorial limits held void ab initio under Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

15 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s Fine Footwear Private Limited, was the first defendant in a civil suit (O.S. No.2598/2019) filed by the respondents (Skechers enti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction Applications in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suits — No Prima Facie Case for Confusion Between 'Manugraph' and 'Simarq' or 'Ezeego' and 'La Travenues'. The court held that the marks are not deceptively similar and the goods/services are different, thus no interim relief is warranted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

15 Jun 2016

The judgment involves two suits for trademark infringement and passing off. In Suit No. 516 of 2013, the plaintiff Manugraph India Limited sought to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds IPAB Order Expunging Trademark 'Creative' for Deceptive Similarity in Travel Services. Petitioner's mark 'Creative Tours & Travels' held deceptively similar to respondent's registered mark 'Creative Travel', causing confusion among consumers under Section 9(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

4 May 2016

The petitioner, Creative Tours & Travels (India) Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ITM Mark Based on Honest and Concurrent User Defence. Defendant's prior and continuous use of identical mark since 1994 established honest and concurrent user under Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, defeating claim for injunction.

15 Sep 2014

The plaintiffs, ITM Trust and its trustees, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant, Educate India Society, alle...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

9 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Appellant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Similar Trade Dress Found Deceptively Similar Despite Different Word Marks. The court held that the essential features of the appellant's label were deceptively similar to the respondent's registered label, justifying an interlocutory injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Copyright Act, 1957.

20 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from an interlocutory injunction granted by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in a suit filed by Sopariwala Exports (the first ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Based on Prior Use and Consent Award. The court restrained the defendants from using a deceptively similar trademark, holding that the plaintiffs' registered mark and prior use established a prima facie case.

26 Apr 2011

The plaintiffs, Surat Goods Transport Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Total Logistics India Pvt....

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Copyright Claim Dismissed Due to Lack of Originality. The court held that slavish imitation of another's mark does not qualify as an original artistic work under the Copyright Act, 1957, but upheld the injunction for trademark infringement and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

18 Mar 2011

The appeal arose from an order of a single judge granting interlocutory reliefs in a suit for trademark infringement and passing off. The respondents,...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)