Search Results for "Tariff classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Tariff classification"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Heinz India and GSK, Classifies Nycil Prickly Heat Powder as Medicated Talcum Powder Under Sales Tax Acts. Product Held Not to Be Medicine Despite Medicinal Properties Due to Specific Statutory Entries Including Medicated Talcum Powder Under Entry 127 of KGST Act and Toilet Powder Under Entry 1(iii) of TNGST Act.

4 May 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals concerning the classification of Nycil Prickly Heat Powder under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 (KGST Act...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Captive Power Producers in Hydel Policy Dispute Over Water Royalty Charges. The court held that the agreements incorporating the government policy did not impose water royalty liability on captive power producers, distinguishing them from independent power producers under the policy framework.

6 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by M/s. Indsil Hydro Power and Manganese Limited (INDSIL) and Carborundum Universal Limited (CUMI) against a comm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Question of Excisability of Goods Is a Question of Rate of Duty Appealable Only to Supreme Court Under Section 35L(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Amendment Inserting Sub-section (2) Is Clarificatory in Nature.

6 Dec 2019

The case involves a reference to a Full Bench of the Bombay High Court to determine the appealability of a Tribunal order regarding excisability of go...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Steel Products Classified as 'Angles, Shapes and Sections' Under Section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court holds that MRP-based valuation applies only when product is covered by Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and rules thereunder.

27 Sep 2013

The judgment involves three writ appeals filed by M/s Meenakshi Steel Re-rolling Mills and M/s Bhuwalka Steel Industries Limited against the Union of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

31 Jul 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extended Period Demand Under Section 11A of Central Excise Act — Suppression of Facts Justifies Extended Limitation. Forgings Classified Under Chapter 84 as Machinery Parts, Not Eligible for Exemption Under Notification No.223/88.

24 Aug 2010

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/s Rajkumar Forge Limited and its director challenging orders of the Commissioner of Central...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Binding Effect of Appellate Order Upheld. The Assistant Collector could not reclassify goods under a different tariff heading after the Collector (Appeals) had decided the classification in favor of the assessee and the Revenue had accepted that decision.

4 May 2005

The petitioners, The Rubber Products Limited and its Managing Director, were engaged in the manufacture of vacuum brake hoses used in railway wagons. ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)