Search Results for "Structured Formula Compensation"

70 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 70 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurance Company Held Liable Despite No Negligence Proof. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.1,84,200 to Rs.2,50,000 with 9% Interest.

The appellant, Nizambhai Vallibhai Dosani, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Enhances Compensation from Rs. 3,36,000 to Rs. 6,21,000. Multiplier of 18 applied for deceased aged 26 years, contributory negligence set aside, and conventional heads enhanced under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 11.10.2011 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, in Claim Petition No. 221/06. The appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Police Constable in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act. Permanent Disability of 45% Leads to Recalculation of Compensation Using Multiplier Method, Setting Aside Inadequate Tribunal Award.

The appellant, Vilas Bagde, a police constable, was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 23 January 1995 when a jeep dashed his scooter. He sustaine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of a 19-Year-Old Student. Court holds that future prospects must be considered even for non-earning deceased, and multiplier should be based on age of deceased, not claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants, who are the legal heirs of the deceased, a 19-year-old student named Pra...