Search Results for "Separate Industrial Establishments"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Labour Court Order in Industrial Dispute — Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication on Merits. Failure to Provide Reasoned Decision and Non-Consideration of Evidence Constitutes Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Limited, challenged an order of the Labour Court, Nashik, dated 30 November 2024, which dismissed the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Condition in Housekeeping Contracts. Court holds that condition requiring prior hospital experience for housekeeping work is arbitrary and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Mahalsa Services and Cam Industrial Services challenging a tender condition imposed by the State of Goa ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Sanitation Worker Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Model Standing Orders under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 held inapplicable to municipal hospital as it is not an industrial establishment.

The petitioner, a sanitation worker at Talera Hospital, Chinchwad, filed a complaint under Items 5, 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESI Corporation's Appeal, Holds Software Development as Manufacturing Process Under ESI Act. Computer software development is a manufacturing process under Section 2(k) Factories Act, 1948, making employees eligible for ESI coverage.

The judgment concerns two appeals filed against orders of the Employees' Insurance Court, Mumbai, which had held that computer software development co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order for Full Back Wages and Retrenchment Compensation to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Company's Claim of Financial Difficulty and Closure Not Sufficient to Deny Workmen's Entitlement Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, D.G.P.Windsor (India) Ltd., challenged an order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane in Complaint (ULP) No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practices in MRTU & PULP Act Case. Employer directed to reinstate employee with full back wages and permanency benefits for engaging in unfair labour practices under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd., a public limited company engaged in supply of textile machinery and civil construction, challenged th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Right to Claim Both Gratuity and Retrenchment Compensation; Section 25F(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, interpreted to allow dual benefits.

The dispute originated from an industrial reference between the Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. and its workmen concerning a claim for gratuity. The employe...