Search Results for "Section 52(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 52(1)"

254 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 254 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Default Bail Computation Issue to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Precedents. The Court Examines Whether Date of Remand is Included or Excluded in Calculating 60/90-Day Period Under Section 167(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for Entitlement to Default Bail.

27 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court addressed a reference concerning the computation of the remand period for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Work Order Containing Arbitration Clause Constitutes Valid Arbitration Agreement Between Contractor and Property Owner.

25 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Shilpi Constructions Engineers & Contractors, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Bus Driver's Negligence Established by Preponderance of Probabilities. Non-examination of Pillion Rider Not Fatal to Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Feb 2019

The case arises from a motor accident on 28 October 2011, when Sitaram, a senior government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle with a pillion rid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order for Orally Terminated Employee. Oral Termination Without Departmental Inquiry Held Illegal Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

6 Dec 2018

The petitioner, Uddeshwar Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha and its Head Master, challenged the judgment and order of the School Tribunal dated 26/08/1999 in ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rent Control Matter — Concurrent Findings on Deposit of Rent Under Section 43 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 Upheld. The court held that the tenant failed to establish grounds for deposit of rent under Section 43(1) and (2) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, and the concurrent findings of the courts below did not warrant interference under Section 115 of CPC.

13 Feb 2017

The case involves a revision petition filed by the tenants (petitioners) against the order dated 17.07.2013 in R.R.No.11/2013 passed by the I Addl. Di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application in Arbitration Dispute Over Barge Sale Agreement. Jurisdictional Objection Must Be Decided Before Granting or Refusing Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Mar 2016

The appellant, M/s. Prince Marine Transport Services Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Asset Managers in Commercial Paper Recovery Suit Despite Pending SICA Appeal. The court held that Section 22 of SICA does not bar recovery suits where BIFR has declined registration, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issue.

5 Feb 2016

The plaintiffs, Pramerica Asset Managers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed two summary suits against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 25 c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Leave Under Clause 12 Letters Patent — Holds That Regional Office of Defendant Company Confers Territorial Jurisdiction. The court clarified that the Explanation to Section 20 CPC does not override Clause 12 of the Letters Patent, and a defendant company carrying on business through a regional office in Mumbai can be sued there even if the cause of action arose elsewhere.

3 Aug 2015

The appellant, KPL International Limited, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 18 June 2015 of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Complaint Against Wife in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. No Evidence of Consent or Connivance by Joint Account Holder Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

16 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Ashish C. Shah, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)