Search Results for "Section 378 CrPC"

340 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 340 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Abates State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Death of Accused. Appeal under Section 378 CrPC becomes infructuous upon death of accused-respondent, as per Section 394(1) CrPC.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Expeditious Disposal of Execution Case and Restoration of Conviction — Execution Case Already Disposed, Conviction Set Aside on Appeal. No Mandamus Issued as Relief Sought Became Infructuous.

The petitioner, Mr. Hemachandra M. Kuppalli, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Granting Permission to Private Person to Conduct Prosecution Under Section 302 CrPC. Permission Cannot Be Granted Mechanically Merely Because Applicant Is an Aggrieved Party; Exceptional Circumstances Required.

The appeal arose from an order of the Bombay High Court allowing respondent No. 2 (the complainant) to conduct prosecution under Section 302 of the Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 302 IPC Based on Dying Declarations. Multiple Consistent Dying Declarations by Deceased Naming Accused as Perpetrator Held Sufficient for Conviction Despite Property Dispute Motive.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by Amit Mishra, the son of the deceased Nirmalabai, against the acquittal of the accused Jagadambaprasad Mis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...