Search Results for "Section 34(2)"

710 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 710 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Appeals in Forest Officer Assault Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Allegations of Assault and Wrongful Confinement by Forest Officers Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 323, 342, 504 IPC.

The case involves a criminal revision petition and two criminal appeals arising from an incident where the complainant, a forest officer, alleged that...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Shrikant Sukhdeo Borkar, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 376, 323, and 342 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Taking or Enticing Minor. Prosecution Fails to Prove Essential Ingredients of Section 363 IPC as Minor Victim's Testimony Does Not Establish That She Was Taken Away by Accused.

The appellants, Sau. Banu Ramchandra Borgaonkar and Sandip Kedar Pande, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Family Feud Case. Court acquits three other accused due to lack of evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two cross appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dated October 9, 1987, in Sessions Case No.84 of...