Search Results for "Section 32(2)"

282 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Trust Land Exchange Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Oral Exchange Agreement from 1956 Not Proved; Possession Not Established; Suit for Declaration and Injunction Dismissed.

The appellant, Shree Nootan Kelavani Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Case — Order Dismissing Section 47 Application Set Aside. Execution Court's Failure to Consider Objections Regarding Arbitral Award's Enforceability Constitutes Jurisdictional Error Under Section 115 CPC.

The present Civil Revision Petition was filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 19.03.2022 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee in Income Tax Appeal Over TDS Disallowance. Disallowance of Rs. 57,11,625 upheld under Section 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act, 1961 as assessee failed to deduct tax at source on payments exceeding Rs. 20,000 per goods receipt to truck operators under Section 194C.

The dispute arose from an income tax assessment for the year 2005-2006 involving Shree Choudhary Transport Company, a partnership firm engaged in tran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Muslim Divorced Woman in Maintenance Case — Family Court Has Jurisdiction Under Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. High Court erred in holding that Family Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain application under Section 3 of the Act.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside an order of the Family Court granting maintenance to a Muslim divorced wo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes De Novo Trial Order in Summary Case — Section 326(3) CrPC Does Not Mandate Retrial When Evidence Already Recorded by Predecessor Magistrate. Successor Magistrate Can Proceed from Stage of Final Arguments.

The petitioner, Ulhas s/o Fulchand Rathod, was being tried in Summary Criminal Case No. 597/2008 for offences under Sections 143, 294, 341, 504, 506 o...