Search Results for "Section 28"

197 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 197 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Anticipatory Bail to Former Public Servants in Liquor Procurement Scam. Prima Facie Evidence of Misappropriation of Over Rs.3,000 Crore and Manipulation of Liquor Brands Justifies Refusal of Pre-Arrest Bail Under Section 438 CrPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The Supreme Court dismissed three special leave petitions filed by P. Krishna Mohan Reddy and K. Dhananjaya Reddy challenging the common order of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Quashing of DV Act Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC — Inherent Jurisdiction Available Despite Civil Nature of Reliefs. High Court Erred in Holding That Proceedings Under DV Act Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC Because They Are Civil in Nature.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from a common order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, which had dismissed petitions under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Restoration of Appeal Allowed: Compromise Non-compliance Entitles Statutory Remedy. Failure to honor compromise terms allows restoration of appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure.

The Supreme Court held that in cases of non-compliance with compromise terms, a party has the statutory right to seek restoration of an appeal. The Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Beneficial Interpretation to Uphold Rights of Marginalized Landowners in Land Acquisition Cases.

The Supreme Court reiterated that Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act must be interpreted as a beneficial provision to remove inequality in compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Dismisses B.V. Jewels' Plea, Upholds Interest Demand on Customs Liability" "Customs Act’s interest provisions reaffirmed; liabilities clarified."

Acts and Sections Discussed: Customs Act, 1962: Section 18(3): Interest on final/re-assessment orders. Section 28: Recovery of duties not levie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Resolving the Jurisdiction of Customs Officers and DRI under Customs Act, 1962.

The Supreme Court addressed the powers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) officers as "proper officers" under the Customs Act, specifically ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Show Cause Notice Quashed Due to Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Adjudication" "15-year delay in Customs Act proceedings deemed unreasonable and prejudicial by the Court"

The Bombay High Court quashed a 2008 show cause notice issued under the Customs Act, 1962, against the Petitioner, citing an inordinate, unexplained d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Petition Challenging Clause 3(ii) of Public Notice No. 55 of 2024 Dismissed by High Court. High Court clarifies Clause 3(ii) requirement for explanation of identical FOB values under the ASEAN-India Preferential Trade Agreement, upholding procedural verification for customs compliance.

The High Court dismissed the Petition challenging Clause 3(ii) of Public Notice No. 55/2024, dated June 24, 2024, and affirmed that requiring importer...