Search Results for "Section 279 IPC"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Cheating and Forgery Case Citing Parity and Long Incarceration. Investigation Complete, No Custodial Interrogation Required Under Section 439 CrPC.

The judgment pertains to bail applications filed by three applicants — Aditya Avinash Sood, Arunkumar Devnath Singh, and Vishal SurendraKumar Agarwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Applicant Acquitted in Bus Accident Case: Conviction Overturned Due to Lack of Evidence on Rash and Negligent Driving" Court Cites Insufficient Proof of Rashness or Negligence, Discusses Contributory Negligence of the Deceased.

The Bombay High Court in a criminal revision application challenging his conviction for causing the death of a pedestrian due to alleged rash and negl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Tatyarao s/o Ganpatrao Tambe, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.8), Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.3625 of 2001 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Grievous Hurt in Road Accident — Evidence of Eye Witnesses and Spot Panchanama Sufficient to Prove Negligence.

The applicant, Sumedh Shetye, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Valpoi for offences under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rash Driving Case Due to Mitigating Circumstances — Concurrent Findings of Guilt Under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 MV Act Upheld but Sentence Modified to Period Already Undergone.

The applicant, Deepak Babusing Pardeshi, was convicted by the trial court and the appellate court for offences under Sections 279, 304-A, 337, 338 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Upheld as Prosecution Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Sudhir s/o Kalidas Deshmukh, a driver employed with the S.T. Depot, Soyegaon, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Soy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Discharge of Accused in School Van Accident Case — No Prima Facie Case of Rash or Negligent Driving. Court holds that mere involvement in an accident does not establish rash or negligent driving under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present criminal revision was filed by the complainant, Ashok Tarachand Ramteke, challenging the order of the Sessions Judge, Wardha, who discharg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence on Overtaking — State Fails to Prove Negligence in Head-On Collision Between Two Mini Buses Under Sections 279, 337 IPC.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Mohandas S. Gawade, who was charged under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing...