Search Results for "Section 279"

825 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 825 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored

The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Stalking and Rash Driving Case Due to Material Contradictions and Ante-Dated Witness Statements. Conviction under Sections 279, 354D, 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ingredients of Stalking and Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Rakesh Matasharan Shukla challenging his conviction by the Trial Court and upheld by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution of Directors for Delayed TDS Deposit Under Section 276B Income Tax Act — Delay Not Equivalent to Failure to Pay. Vicarious Liability Requires Specific Averments of Being In-Charge and Responsible; No Notice Under Section 2(35) or Order Under Section 201(1) Passed.

The petitioners, directors of M/s. Hubtown Ltd., challenged the issuance of process against them under Section 276B r/w 278B of the Income Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proximity Between Offences and Public Order. Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Held Insufficient to Establish Threat to Public Order Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Salman @ Baba Harun Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 18.01.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on rash and negligent driving causing death of four persons under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC affirmed.

The appellant, Thangasamy, was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Sections 279, 337 (3 counts), and 304-A (4 counts) of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Rash Driving Case: Sentences to Run Concurrently. The Court held that under Section 31 CrPC, it is mandatory to specify whether multiple sentences run concurrently or consecutively, and directed concurrent running of sentences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

The appellant, Gagan Kumar, was prosecuted and convicted by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jalandhar for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving...