Search Results for "Section 25-B"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Labour Court Order of Reinstatement for Rojamdar in Industrial Dispute Case. Continuous Service Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Established Despite Employer's Denial.

The State of Gujarat, through the Range Forest Officer, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Industrial Dispute, Upholding High Court's Finding of Civil Court's Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Entertain Suits Founded on Provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Rendering Such Decrees a Nullity.

The dispute originated from the termination of a daily wage employee by the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board on 1.1.1985. The employee filed C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Workmen Under Industrial Dispute Act. Held that termination without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and workmen are entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

The case involves an appeal filed by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) and its officer against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Badli Worker in Textile Mill. Continuous Service as Badli Worker for Several Years Entitles Worker to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act.

The petitioner, Chalisgaon Textile Mills, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Jalgaon dated 30/04/2002, which partly allowed Complaint (U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Appeal in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Termination for Unauthorized Absence. Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days Continuous Service Under Section 25B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, a workman employed by the respondent company, challenged his termination before the Industrial Court. The Labour Court had dismissed hi...