Search Results for "Section 222"

584 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 584 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Sanction and Cognizance in UAPA Case — No Infirmity Found in Sanction Order or Cognizance Order. Court upholds validity of suo-motu sanction under Section 45(2) of UAPA and cognizance order under Section 120B IPC read with UAPA and CLA Act.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Fuleshwar Gope challenging the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which refused to quash the sanctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Dispute — Petitioner's Rights as Agreement Holder Ignored. Unilateral Conveyance Granted Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, Gayatri Construction, a partnership firm, challenged an order dated 15 November 2022 and corrigendum dated 20 December 2022 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Arbitrator's Orders Refusing to Decide Jurisdiction as Preliminary Issue. Arbitrator Must Rule on Jurisdiction at Threshold Under Section 16 of Arbitration Act, 1940.

The petitioner, M/s. Northroof Ventures Private Limited (formerly M/s. Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt. Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax Liability on Sale of Discarded Materials by BEST Undertaking Under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Court holds that sale of scrap from non-dealer activity is taxable under section 22(5A) and that appeal under section 55(6)(c) is maintainable only on questions of law.

The case involves two references under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a common order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal...