Search Results for "Section 164 CrPC statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Section 164 CrPC statement"

355 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 355 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of FIR in Property Dispute Except for Extortion Allegations. The Court affirmed that allegations involving execution of powers of attorney and settlement deeds were civil in nature and did not constitute criminal offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, while allowing investigation under Section 385 IPC for extortion demands.

12 Nov 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from a High Court judgment that quashed an FIR under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Procedural Defects and Insufficient Evidence - Fundamental Error in Framing Charge Under Deleted Provision and Inconsistent Testimony Fail to Sustain Conviction Under IPC

19 Jan 2026

The High Court allowed the criminal appeal filed by Appellant against his conviction and life imprisonment under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Section 319 CrPC Case, Setting Aside High Court's Remand Order. Trial Court's Dismissal of Summoning Application Upheld as Evidence Was Insufficient to Meet the Stringent Threshold for Exercising Discretionary Power Under Section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

1 Mar 2023

The appeal challenged the Allahabad High Court's order dated 16.05.2017 which had quashed the Trial Court's order dated 15.03.2017 and remanded the ma...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Accused's Right to Default Bail in Pre-Charge Sheet Detention; Holds 60-Day Limit Applies Unless Offence Carries Minimum 10 Years' Imprisonment. Interpretation of 'imprisonment for a term not less than ten years' in Section 167(2) CrPC resolved in favor of personal liberty, entitling accused to statutory bail when charge sheet not filed within 60 days.

1 Jan 1970

The case arose from a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution challenging orders of the Gauhati High Court rejecting bail to the petitioner. Th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Default Bail in PC Act Case, Holds Detention Period of 60 Days Applies When Maximum Sentence is Not Explicitly at Least Ten Years. The Court Interprets 'Imprisonment for a Term Not Less Than Ten Years' in Section 167(2) CrPC to Grant Default Bail When Charge Sheet Not Filed Within 60 Days.

1 Aug 2026

These Special Leave Petitions were preferred against the order of the Gauhati High Court dated 11.01.2017 rejecting the bail application of the petiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Informant Not Being a Scheduled Caste Member. The court held that the bar under Section 18A of the SC/ST Act does not apply when the informant is not a member of a scheduled caste, and the appellant is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

17 Feb 2023

The appellant, Asif @ Ashu Liyakat Pathan, original accused No.4, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Order in Murder Case for Non-Compliance with Section 306 CrPC — Pardon Granted Without Examining Accused as Witness Violates Mandatory Procedure

4 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Mahesh Balasaheb Thakoor, original accused no.3 in a murder case, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Refusal to Drop Witnesses and Array Them as Accused in Sohrabuddin Fake Encounter Case. Court Holds That Power Under Section 319 CrPC Is Discretionary and Cannot Be Invoked by an Accused at Trial Stage Without Evidence.

28 Mar 2016

The applicant, a senior IPS officer and accused No. 2 in the Sohrabuddin fake encounter case, filed a criminal revision challenging the Sessions Court...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Rape and Cheating Case — Prima Facie Case Made Out for Trial. The Sessions Court erred by conducting a mini-trial at the stage of Section 227 CrPC and discharging the accused for offences under Sections 376 and 420/417 IPC based on allegations of false promise of marriage.

11 Nov 2019

The State of Karnataka, through the Mico Layout Police Station, filed a criminal revision petition under Sections 397 read with 401 CrPC challenging t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Stepfather, Citing Matrimonial Dispute Between Parents. Allegations of Sexual Offences Deemed Maliciously Filed Amidst Custody Battle, Court Holds No Prima Facie Case Under Sections 11, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 509 IPC.

6 Feb 2024

The dispute involved a child born in 2008 to the second respondent and his former wife. Following the parents' divorce, a settlement agreement granted...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)