Search Results for "Section 163A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 163A"

96 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased Driver's Income Reassessed at Minimum Wage with Future Prospects and Correct Multiplier. The court held that in the absence of income proof, minimum wage notification should be adopted, and future prospects of 40% and multiplier of 18 are applicable for a 21-year-old bachelor.

9 Mar 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 28.12.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Rajula, in M.A.C.P. No. 863 ...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Death of Homemaker. Notional Income of Rs.3,000 per month considered for homemaker services under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

25 Feb 2026

The appellant, Mubarak Abdulbhai Shaikh, filed a first appeal against the judgment and award dated 13.06.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Trib...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Passenger — Negligence of Driver Proved, Future Prospects and Consortium Awarded. The court held that the Tribunal erred in not adding future prospects and in awarding inadequate consortium, enhancing total compensation from Rs. 4,17,500/- to Rs. 5,80,400/- under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 30.03.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Bhuj at Kuchchh, in M.A.C.P....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Subsequent Petition Under Section 22 of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 Maintainable Despite Dismissal of Earlier Motor Vehicles Act Claim on Ground of Self-Negligence. The Court held that the two Acts operate in different fields and the dismissal of the earlier petition does not bar a claim under the Employee's Compensation Act.

1 Aug 2017

The case involves an appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (formerly Workmen's Compensation Act) by the legal represe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — Pay and Recover Direction Upheld. The Court held that the Insurance Company must pay compensation to the third-party claimant and recover from the insured owner, as the deceased was an occupant of an autorickshaw hit by the insured motorcycle.

17 Mar 2016

The case arises from a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by the legal heirs of Devendra Jotirao Wankhede, who d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence Established by Involvement of Vehicle. Claimants Awarded Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Deceased in Road Accident.

6 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the widow, minor son, and mother of the deceased Prakash Deorao Patil, against the judgment and order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurer's Appeal Reducing Compensation for Death of Two-Year-Old Child in Motor Accident. Notional Income Method Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Accidents Occurring Before Its Enactment.

10 Dec 2013

The case arises from a motor accident claim where a two-year-old child, Shudhodhan, died after a tractor-trolley driven in reverse dashed against the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim. Non-Joinder of Minidor's Owner and Insurer Does Not Vitiate Claim as Tribunal's Negligence Finding Was Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

13 Aug 2013

The case arises from a motor accident on 8/2/2003 when Manoj Mahadeorao Yete, aged 21, was traveling as a passenger in a minidor (MH29/2963) from Bori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Medical Expenses Capped at Rs.15,000 Under Section 163A MV Act. The Tribunal exceeded its limit by awarding medical expenses of Rs.1,17,927/- instead of the prescribed maximum of Rs.15,000/- under Section 163A read with Schedule II of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

7 Mar 2013

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. appealed against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal which granted total compensation of Rs.2,83,727/...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Limits Owner's Liability to Rs. 50,000 Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants' Failure to Prove Negligence Renders Claim Under Section 166 Unsustainable; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under No-Fault Provision.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeals arise out of a motor accident claim case. The appellant in First Appeal No.523 of 2016, Pawan s/o Gulchand Musale, is the owner of...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)