Search Results for "Section 161 CrPC statement"

323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court allowed Appeals in Criminal Case Involving to Summon Additional Accused Under Section 319 CrPC

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal where the appellant, as complainant in an FIR registered under Sections 307, 302, and 120-B of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition, Sets Aside Order Taking Cognizance Against Petitioner in Criminal Case. Court holds that once police files final report dropping accused, Magistrate cannot take cognizance without following procedure under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. for further investigation.

The petitioner, Vijitha, was initially named as an accused in Crime No.318 of 2010 along with her husband (A1) for alleged offences including attempt ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summons Against Accused Not Named in Police Report Under Section 190(1)(b) CrPC. Magistrate Cannot Summon Persons Not Named in Police Report or Column (2) of Report, Proper Course is Under Section 319 CrPC After Evidence Collection.

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal concerning the power of a Magistrate to summon an individual not named in a police report under Section 190(1)(b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in POCSO Case — Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC Set Aside for Lack of Strong Evidence. Identification of Accused Based on Spectacles and Subsequent Improvement in Victim's Statement Held Insufficient to Exercise Discretionary Power Under Section 319 CrPC.

The case involves an appeal against an order of the High Court of Uttarakhand upholding the summoning of the appellant under Section 319 of the Code o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 91 CrPC for Call Data Records in Sheena Bora Murder Case. Court Held That Accused Cannot Seek Production of Documents Not Relied Upon by Prosecution at Pre-Trial Stage.

The petitioner, Pratim @ Peter Mukherjea, accused No.8 in Special Case No.9 of 2016 arising from the Sheena Bora murder case, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.2 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused No.2 shared common intention with accused No.1 to commit murder.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.X, Bengaluru, in S.C.No.83/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302 rea...