Search Results for "Section 156(3)"

62 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 62 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ajim Shah @ Ajju, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 11.01.2016 in Sessions Case No.281 of 2013 for the murd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Devidas Malche, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No.25 of 2014 for the offence punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Grandson in Murder of 82-Year-Old Grandmother over Property Dispute. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, Extra-Judicial Confession, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Convict Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sagar Dwarkanath Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his 82-year-old grandmother, Smt. Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Attempt to Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mahadeva, was convicted by the Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Kollegal, in S.C.No.13/2010 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 309 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mahadeva, was convicted by the Sessions Judge and Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Kollegal in S.C.No.13/2010 for offences punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Evidence of Interested Witness Was Contradictory and Improbable.

The appellant, Kalam Gulab Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of his cousin Sikandar Ismail Patel under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Parricide Case on Ground of Insanity — Section 84 IPC Benefit Granted. Appellant decapitated his father but was found to be suffering from mental unsoundness at the time of incident, leading to acquittal under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Raju Babu Patel, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of his father, Babu Patel, by deca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Sura Attack Case. Death of Mother and Injuries to Son and Daughter-in-law Caused by Accused with Sura, Conviction Under Sections 302, 324, 452 IPC Confirmed.

The appellant, Deepak Bapurao Yedage, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pandharpur for the murder of Indubai and for causing injuries to Pradeep (P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gelsing Pida Pawar, was convicted by the learned Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner in Sessions Case No. 13 of 2006 for the offe...