Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Condition of Deposit of 25% Compensation for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Cases. Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is procedural and applies to pending appeals; condition does not violate Article 21.

The petitioner, Ajay Vinodchandra Shah, was convicted in three separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for cheque bou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability. Directors Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Allegations of Active Role in Business Conduct.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by Mr. H.S. Bedi (Managing Director) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Limitation Bar. Complaint Filed Beyond Limitation After Return for Want of Jurisdiction Cannot Be Entertained Without Fresh Cognizance.

The applicants, original accused Nos. 2 to 4, challenged the order dated 18.06.2016 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gangapur, issuing p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Resignation Prior to Cheque Issuance and Absence of Specific Averments Under Section 141 NI Act Lead to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by Bhagirath Chandulal Arya (respondent No. 1) under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Lack of Specific Allegations. Applicant Director Not Involved in Day-to-Day Affairs of Company, No Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 NI Act.

The applicant, Vijay Khairatilal Bhatia, was accused No. 5 in a criminal complaint filed by respondent No. 1, Ashwin Ramesh Mittal, under Section 138 ...