Search Results for "Section 130 Customs Act"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Order Dismissing ROM Application as Time-Barred. Time Limit Under Section 129B(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Applies Only to Suo Moto Rectification, Not to Applications Filed by Parties.

The appellant, M/s. Allied Fibers Ltd., imported capital goods between October 1994 and September 1995. A show cause notice was issued on 24.03.1998 d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal by Patel Engineering Ltd in Import Misdeclaration Case. Confiscation of Goods and Penalty Upheld for Violation of Sections 111(d) and (m) of Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Patel Engineering Ltd, filed a Customs Appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the concurrent findings of the Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Interest. Interest Awarded from Arbitrator's Appointment Date Upheld as Within Discretion Under Section 31(7)(a) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Reducing Redemption Fine and Penalty Without Reasons. Tribunal's reliance on non-binding precedent from another bench held improper as it ignored its own earlier order.

The Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, Excise and...