Search Results for "SICOM"

65 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 65 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows JSW Steel's Challenge to Electricity Duty Demand on Captive Consumption. Held that electricity generated from captive power plant and consumed for own use is not 'sold' and thus not exigible to electricity duty under the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. JSW Steel Limited, a company engaged in steel manufacturing, operates a captive power plant (CPP) at its factory in Raigad, Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Decree Holder's Application to Implead Auction Purchaser in Execution Proceedings — Order VI Rule 17 CPC Application Rejected as Execution is Not a 'Trial' and Amendment Would Change Nature of Suit

The petitioner, Sangli Zilla Parishad Employees Co-operative Credit Society Limited, had advanced a loan to respondent no.1, Ninaidevi Sahakari Sakhar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Occupancy Certificate Proceedings. Land Tribunal's order set aside as it was passed without notice to petitioners and without considering their objections under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are agriculturists, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Upholds Recall of Annulment Order in Insolvency Case Due to Concealment of Creditor. Appellant Insolvent Failed to Disclose Kotak Mahindra Bank as Creditor with DRT Recovery Certificate, Leading to Recall of Annulment Under Section 22(1) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The case involves an appeal filed by Akshay D. Thakkar (the Appellant/Insolvent) against an order dated 18th September, 2018 passed by a learned Singl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Winding Up Order Due to Defective Advertisement Under Rule 99 of Company Court Rules, 1959. Failure to Advertise in Correct Name of Company Violates Mandatory Requirement and Cannot Be Cured by Inherent Powers.

The appeal challenged an order dated 21 June 2018 by which the learned Company Judge allowed Company Petition No. 829 of 2003 filed by SICOM Limited f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Company's Ability to Secure Debt. Section 434(1)(a) of Companies Act, 1956 Requires Creditor to Consider Offer of Security Before Deeming Company Unable to Pay Debts.

The appeal was filed by Stonemann Royale Limited against an order dated 19 March 2018 made by the learned Company Judge admitting and ordering adverti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Magnetite Powder Price. The court held that triable issues existed but the defendant's defence was not wholly bona fide, warranting security under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 38,89,674.14 filed by the plaintiff (M/s. Parijat Enterprises...