Search Results for "SEBI regulations"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "SEBI regulations"

122 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 122 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

21 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

High Court

Judicial Review of SEBI's Freezing of Petitioner Demat Account. Examining the Legality of SEBI’s Actions in the Context of Promoter Regulations and Investor Rights.

26 Aug 2024

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) ordered the freezing of Dr. Pradeep Mehta's demat account, citing his status as a former promoter of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Mutual Fund Against Sales Tax Reassessment Orders — Holds Mutual Fund Not a Dealer Under MVAT Act, 2002. Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Beyond Limitation Period and Without Proper Sanction Are Invalid.

6 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Axis Mutual Fund, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging several orders passed by the sales ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

5 Nov 2014

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrators' Findings on Contract Notes and Liability. Court holds that failure to object to contract notes within reasonable time amounts to acceptance under NSE Bye-Laws and that arbitral tribunal's findings on facts and law are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Harinarayan Bajaj, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Limitation Grounds — Section 34 Application Filed Beyond Limitation Period. Court holds that period of limitation for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from the date of receipt of the original award and is not extended by a subsequent correction application under Section 33.

7 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd, a member of the National Stock Exchange and Bombay Stock Exchange, had disputes with its constituent, re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Share Transaction Dispute — Limitation Period Governed by Limitation Act, 1963 Pursuant to SEBI Circulars. The court held that SEBI circulars override stock exchange byelaws, and the claim filed within three years under the Limitation Act was not barred.

24 Jul 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Rejection of Counterclaim on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation for counterclaim in arbitration under BSE Byelaws runs from date of filing of claim, not from accrual of cause of action.

2 Nov 2012

The Petitioner, Hansraj Sohanlal Gouthi, HUF, through its Karta Ravi Gouthi, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 July 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)