Search Results for "Rule 25-A"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Application Due to Non-Existence of Arbitration Agreement — No Prima Facie Case for Reference to Arbitration Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicant, Unistar Metals Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reference ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions of Lecturers Challenging Termination by Unaided Private Engineering College. Termination of Probationers for Unsatisfactory Performance Does Not Amount to Retrenchment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Is Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by lecturers (Sudhakar Shivaram Teke, Prof. S. S. Rayamane, and Udaykumar Govindrao Gurlhosur) agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Refusal to Approve Appointment in Minority Institution — MEPS Rules Not Applicable to Non-Aided Minority Schools. Director of Vocational Education erred in applying Rule 9(7)-(10) of MEPS Rules to a non-aided minority institution, violating Article 30(1) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Dr. Antonio Da Silva Technical High School and Junior College and its managing trust, are a non-aided minority educational institutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Competent Authority's Order for Possession Upheld Due to Non-Payment of Rent and Unauthorized Subletting.

The petitioner, AMI Merchandising Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the judgment and order dated 14/0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petitions for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Petitions Challenging Lok Sabha Elections Failed to Plead Material Facts Constituting Corrupt Practices as Required Under Section 83 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The judgment pertains to four applications filed by returned candidates in election petitions challenging their election to the Lok Sabha from various...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Refusal to Strike Out Additional Written Statement. Tribunal's Discretion to Allow Additional Pleadings Upheld Unless Prejudice Shown.

The petitioner, GTL Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 10.2.2006 passed...