Search Results for "Rule 17(a)"

118 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 17A of PC Act — FIR Registered Without Prior Approval from Competent Authority for Investigation Against Public Servant

The petitioner, Ningappa G @ Ningappa Savant, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) / Section 52...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Additional Documents in Eviction Suit — No Error in Exercise of Discretion Under Order 13 Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioners, as plaintiffs in a suit for eviction, sued two defendants. The second defendant, during his cross-examination, applied to produce cer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Bank Employee Terminated Without Proper Inquiry. Termination Based on Criminal Arrest Without Conviction and Without Domestic Inquiry Held Illegal Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Ltd., challenged the awards passed by the Labour Court at Kolhapur dated 13th February 2014 (Part-I Award) and 15th May 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Examine Opponent as Witness in Civil Suit — Order Rejecting Application Set Aside. Court holds that after 1996 amendment to CPC, there is no bar to calling the opposite party as a witness under Order XVI Rule 21 CPC.

The petitioner, M/s. Ravalnath Builders, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 15.02.2011 passed by the learned Civil J...