Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Rule 11-A"

329 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 329 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Madras Hears Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Duty Demand on Photographic Film Conversion — Tribunal's Order on Revenue Neutrality and Limitation Questioned. Revenue challenges CESTAT's order setting aside duty demand of Rs. 20,37,33,174 under Section 11A(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944 on grounds of revenue neutrality and time-bar.

23 Jul 2026

Background: The appeal arose from a central excise duty demand on a company engaged in converting jumbo rolls of photographic films and trading import...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Against Labour Court Orders Granting Reinstatement with Back Wages to Employee -- Upholds Violation of Natural Justice in Departmental Inquiry Under Industrial Disputes Act

7 Jan 2026

The petitioner Bank challenged orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court that declared a departmental inquiry against the respondent employee il...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

7 Apr 2025

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Limitation Issue - Extended Period Invoked for Differential Duty Demand Based on Transfer of Advance Licenses. The Court remanded the matter to CESTAT for fresh consideration on whether the assessee's bonafide belief based on a Tribunal decision later reversed by the Supreme Court precludes invocation of extended period under Section 11A(1) proviso of Central Excise Act, 1944.

4 Jul 2023

The present appeals were filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs against the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Trib...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Interim Relief Against Dismissal in Misappropriation Case. Labour Court and Industrial Court Correctly Refused to Restrain Employer from Issuing Punishment Order at Second Show Cause Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Dhanraj Gaikwad, was employed as a clerk with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) since 2008. He was charge-sheet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Appointment of Receiver in Share Pledge Dispute. Court upholds appointment of Court Receiver as receiver of pledged shares under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that the appellant failed to make out a prima facie case for interference.

10 Aug 2019

The case involves two commercial appeals filed against an order of the learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as receiver of certain pledg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on Unjust Enrichment. Bar of Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Provisional Assessment Cases Prior to Amendment of Rule 9B of Central Excise Rules, 1944.

3 May 2018

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-III Commissionerate, against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Unauthorized Possession and Lapsed Proceedings. Possession taken in 2001 without acquisition; court directs compensation under 2013 Act with interest from date of possession.

26 Mar 2015

The petitioners, four agriculturists from village Koradgaon Hilalpur, owned agricultural land admeasuring 1 hectare 73 ares (4 acres 13 ares) out of G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Against Subsistence Allowance Order in De Novo Enquiry. Employee dismissed after departmental enquiry is entitled to subsistence allowance during de novo proceedings before Labour Court under Model Standing Orders.

24 Jan 2011

The petitioner, Mumbai Cricket Association, challenged an order of the 12th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 15th October 2010, which directed the payment ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Gosikhurd Project Due to Non-Compliance with Section 11 of RFCTLARR Act. Failure to Issue Notice and Conduct Social Impact Assessment Renders Acquisition Invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, 25 individuals from Adyal village in Bhandara district, filed a writ petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings initiated ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)