Search Results for "Redevelopment Agreement"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under Slum Act for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) — Acquisition of Petitioner's Land by Deputy Collector Set Aside for Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The petitioner, NESCO Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of its land bearing CT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Case on Jurisdiction and Limitation Grounds. Civil Court Maintainability Upheld Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and Suit Found Within Limitation with Possible Section 14 Benefit.

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project involving a Cooperative Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Resolving Housing Society Redevelopment Deadlock. Redevelopment rights of the cooperative housing society upheld amid developer's insolvency proceedings.

The Bombay High Court addressed a long-standing dispute over the redevelopment of a dilapidated housing society in Bandra (East), Mumbai. The Petition...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.

The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment Scheme Under DCR 33(7) — Consents Verified and Video Recorded. Tenants Who Refused to Vacate Were Issued Notices Under Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976; Court Found No Merit in Grievance.

The ten petitioners, occupants of a cessed structure on CS 1101, Khandia Street, Byculla, Mumbai, challenged a redevelopment scheme sanctioned by MHAD...