High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board"
91 result(s) found
Found 91 result(s)
High Court
- 43
High Court
KAHC010479002008_1
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes NGT Directions Against Hikal Ltd. in Gas Leak Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction by Issuing Directions Without Proper Notice and Hearing. The Court held that the NGT's suo motu proceedings and subsequent orders directing closure and compensation violated principles of natural justice and the procedural requirements under the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
22 Feb 2024The petitioner, Hikal Ltd., a chemical manufacturing company, challenged the orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) dated 18th January 2022 and 2...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Environmental Protection in Public Interest Litigation Regarding Construction on Agricultural Land. Court Directs Demolition of Unauthorized Structures and Restoration of Land to Original Condition Under Maharashtra Agricultural Universities Act, 1983 and Environmental Laws.
21 Oct 2011The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL No. 34/2010) initiated suo motu by the court and a connected Writ P...
- 302
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...
- 43
High Court
High Court at Bombay Considers Challenge to Revised Guidelines for Grant of Offshore Exploration Licence. Petitioner Argues Notification Violates Section 35 of Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 and Article 14.
17 Sep 2013The writ petition was filed by Rare(H) Minerals Private Limited, a company engaged in prospecting and exploration, challenging the Notification (Revis...
- 10
High Court
Karnataka High Court Examines Applicability of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to Quarrying on Alleged Forest Land. Petitioner challenges communications requiring forest clearance certificate for quarry operations on government land in Survey No. 124, Hadonahalli Village, raising the question whether the land is forest land under the Act.
30 Apr 2026The petition was filed by a stone crushing firm challenging communications that interdicted its quarrying and crushing operations on the ground that t...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Limited Scope of Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Affirms Modification of Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Per Annum.
12 Jan 2017The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
6 Apr 2026The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...
- 200
