Search Results for "Railway pension rules"

113 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 113 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging CAT Order Granting Full Pension to Widow of Deceased Railway Employee. Period of Removal from Service Counted as Qualifying Service for Pension Under Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993.

The Union of India (Railways) filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Court, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Retired Heavy Water Plant Employees Seeking Coverage Under Payment of Gratuity Act -- Central Government Employees Governed by CCS Rules Excluded from PG Act Provisions

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by retired employees of Heavy Water Plant, Department of Atomic Energy, Tuticorin, who sought coverage under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order for Compassionate Appointment. Rejection of elder brother's application for producing bogus certificate does not bar younger son's independent claim for compassionate appointment under Railway Establishment Code.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Railway) against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) directing consideration of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Setting Aside Enhanced Penalty in Railway Disciplinary Case. Disproportionate Enhancement of Pension Cut from Three to Five Years Quashed Due to Non-Consideration of Evidence and Violation of Article 14.

The Union of India and other railway authorities filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 16th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order in Railway Casual Labour Reinstatement Case. Central Administrative Tribunal's order for reinstatement of casual labour with continuity of service upheld as Railways failed to prove abandonment of service.

The petitioners, Union of India through the Divisional Railway Manager, Central Railways, challenged the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses IAS Officer's Challenge to Compulsory Retirement in Public Interest. Service Record Including Adverse Entries and Minor Punishment Justified Action Under Rule 16(3) of All India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958.

The petitioner, Paramjeet Singh Bhogal, an IAS officer of the 1967 batch allotted to Maharashtra Cadre, challenged the order of compulsory retirement ...