Search Results for "Pune Municipal Corporation Overruled"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Pune Municipal Corporation Overruled"

68 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowners' Claim in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Payment of Compensation. Acquisition Proceedings Deemed to Have Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Compensation Was Not Actually Paid Despite Being Tendered.

11 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal challenging the Delhi High Court's order that declared land acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases Due to Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Lapsed as Compensation Was Deposited with Collector But Not Paid to Landowners, Failing Statutory Requirement.

11 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court disposed of a bunch of appeals involving common questions of law and fact regarding land acquisition proceedings. The background inv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court Order Declaring Proceedings Lapsed. Acquisition Upheld as Physical Possession Taken and Land Utilized for Public Purpose, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Feb 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring that acquisition proceedings under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. The Court held that acquisition proceedings did not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, as physical possession was taken, and the writ petitioner failed to establish ownership and title required for challenging the acquisition.

20 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquisit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case, Reversing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying Only One of Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

20 Jan 2023

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that land acquisiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows DDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Overturns High Court's Lapsing Declaration. Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal overrules earlier precedent, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not apply where possession has been taken but compensation not paid.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acqu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Challenging Composition of Tree Authority Under Maharashtra Trees Act — Nominated Members Cannot Exceed Elected Members. Interpretation of Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 requires parity between elected and nominated members in Tree Authority.

19 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Zoru Darayus Bhathena, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the composition of the Tree Authority for the Municipal Corporat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidation of OBC Claim — Petitioner Disqualified as Councillor. Court upholds committee's finding that petitioner failed to prove 'Teli' caste claim due to lack of valid documents and adverse vigilance report.

21 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Jagdish Revansiddha Patil, was elected as a councillor of Solapur Municipal Corporation from a ward reserved for Other Backward Class ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalidation of OBC Claim — Petitioner Disqualified as Councillor. Court upholds committee's order based on vigilance report and lack of valid documents, finding no perversity warranting interference under Article 226.

21 Oct 2016

The petitioner, Jagdish Revansiddha Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging three orders: (1) the orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree Declaring Plaintiffs' Ownership of 3/4th Share in Suit Property. Agreements Executed by Co-Owners Held Not Binding on Plaintiffs' Undivided Share Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

25 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from a judgment and order dated 21 August 2003 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, in Special Civil Suit No.2107 ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)