Search Results for "Preventive Detention Act"

917 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 917 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides on Validity of Preventive Detention Orders Under Maharashtra Dangerous Activities Act for Fixing One-Year Detention Period. Detention Orders Challenged as Contrary to Supreme Court Precedent Prohibiting Fixing Maximum Period Without Periodic Review.

The Bombay High Court heard three criminal writ petitions together as they involved a common question of law regarding preventive detention orders pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat — Single Crime and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Sustain Detention as 'Dangerous Person'.

The petitioner, Vicky Satyawan Chavan @ Barkya, challenged a preventive detention order dated 08/07/2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay — Preventive Detention Invalidated as Live Link Between Grounds and Detention Purpose Broken

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Zainul Abbas Shabbir Rajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Placement of Vital Documents. Failure to Place Retraction Statements and Bail Orders Before Detaining Authority Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, son of the detenu Ramesh B. Doshi, challenged an order of preventive detention passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Material. Single Criminal Case Under Prohibition Act Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Sections 2(b) and 3 of the Act.

The case involved a challenge to a preventive detention order passed against the detenue under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1...