Search Results for "Pension withholding"

155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement Notice Before Intended Date in Service Matter - Rule 65 MCS (Pension) Rules, 1982 Does Not Bar Withdrawal. Senior Clerk's Withdrawal Request Made on Same Day Before Retirement Time Held Valid, Rejection Set Aside.

The petitioner, Vithal s/o Lingoji Kalyankar, was a Senior Clerk in the District Court at Nanded, having joined service on 06.06.1988. After about 30 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalid Order and Directs Restoration of Pension in Halba Tribe Claim Case. Petitioner's Caste Certificate Invalidated Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Vinayak Marotrao Mahajan, a retired Deputy Engineer from Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged the order dated 29.12.2017 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Recovery Orders Imposed on Retired Junior Engineer Without Inquiry. Recovery of Rs. 86,52,163 and Withholding of Pension Without Departmental Inquiry Held Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, a retired Junior Engineer of Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM), challenged orders dated 29-07-2021 and 16-10-2017 impo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Pension Calculation Based on Punishment of Reduction in Salary. Reduction in salary imposed as penalty cannot be used to compute last drawn pay for pension under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioner, Dr. Ramchandra Bapu Nirmale, was a Medical Officer employed with the State of Maharashtra and ESIC from 20 December 1978 to 31 August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Government Officer Due to Bar Under Civil Services Rules — Prosecution for Misappropriation of Funds Held Barred by Rule 214(3) and (6) of Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1958 as Sanction Was Not Obtained.

The petitioner, a former Block Development Officer, was accused of misappropriating Rs.11,47,360/- during 2004-2005. An FIR was registered under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Punishment of Withholding Increments Without Departmental Enquiry. Punishment of permanently withholding two increments is a major penalty requiring a formal departmental enquiry under service rules.

The petitioner, Narendra s/o Motiram Bodkhe, a government servant, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Pa...