Search Results for "Pain shock and suffering"

244 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim - Tribunal's Failure to Award Conventional Heads and Proper Income Assessment Leads to Enhancement. The Court enhanced compensation by Rs. 50,000 under pain, shock, and suffering with 7.5% interest per annum.

The appellant, Mukeshbhai alias Tulshibhai Lakhmanbhai Parmar, filed a first appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act against the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation for Injured Pillion Rider in Motor Accident. Future Prospects at 40% Added for 28-Year-Old Claimant Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mukeshbhai Babubhai Parmar (Koli), was a pillion rider on a motorcycle on 19.03.2011 when a rickshaw coming from the wrong side at exce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim with Permanent Disability - Tribunal's Award Modified Considering Medical Expenses and Future Loss of Income

The case involves a motor accident claim where the appellant, Rekhaben Girishbhai Patel, along with her husband and minor son, was traveling on a moto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Inadequate Compensation for Driver's Permanent Disability. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.71,300/- to Rs.3,44,800/- for Future Loss of Income, Pain and Suffering, and Loss of Amenities Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Jayeshkumar Ravjibhai Thummar, filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof and Incorrect Multiplier Application. Claimant's Cross-Objection Dismissed as Tribunal's Award Was Not Inadequate Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident on 16.08.1992 when the original claimant, Kaushikbhai Dhansukhlal Shah, was riding his scooter on Makarpura Road...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Amputation of Leg - Compensation Enhanced for Future Loss of Income and Pain and Suffering. Housewife's Notional Income Assessed at Rs.3,000 per Month with Multiplier of 16 for Permanent Disability.

The appellant, Gajaraben Rameshbhai Padhiyar (Parmar), filed a first appeal before the Gujarat High Court against the judgment and award dated 23.01.2...